« Perhaps the MJS should hire a community columnist to fact-check Pat McIlheran | Main | Lott-Reid analogies laughable »

January 07, 2010


Rick Esenberg

I don't know why you would regard my noting an argument that was being made at the time and saying that it wouldn't carry much weight is a puerile attack. Nor do I understand why it is a flip flop to say now that I am not impressed by an argument that I said then would not carry much weight. As to what was cut out of my remarks, you can find it here.

Really, I think you're trying too hard.

John Foust

Standard Contradictory Disclaimer™.

Mike Plaisted

As usual, Esenberg validates wing-nut arguments he pretends to be unenthused about. He did the same thing when Gableman put out his racist ad. "Well, I wish he hdan't done that," he said at the time, while denying its racist intent and being entirely pleased with the result.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    December 2012

    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    2 3 4 5 6 7 8
    9 10 11 12 13 14 15
    16 17 18 19 20 21 22
    23 24 25 26 27 28 29
    30 31